2015/10/03 Weekly 2A FB Report

Iowa High School Boys Football

Rankings

    R  Team                  Conf ( W- L)    Mod Str  Sched  Rank     Off Ave      Def Ave
    1  Albia                 2A-7 ( 6- 0) 202.77  6W 151.30 ( 45)  50.33 (  1)   6.83 (  2)
    2  Tama South Tama       2A-6 ( 6- 0) 198.98  6W 159.51 ( 34)  38.17 (  7)   1.33 (  1)
    3  North Fayette Valley  2A-3 ( 4- 2) 192.69  1L 176.95 (  3)  27.33 ( 19)  13.33 (  7)
    4  Williamsburg          2A-5 ( 5- 1) 191.28  4W 166.53 ( 14)  34.67 ( 10)   8.33 (  3)
    5  Anamosa               2A-4 ( 6- 0) 190.25  6W 153.95 ( 42)  44.50 (  4)  15.67 (  9)
    6  Spirit Lake           2A-1 ( 6- 0) 187.70  6W 159.50 ( 35)  48.50 (  2)  16.67 ( 13)
    7  Aplington AP          2A-6 ( 5- 1) 184.30  5W 157.17 ( 37)  44.50 (  3)  20.17 ( 20)
    8  Central Lee           2A-5 ( 5- 1) 182.13  1W 150.57 ( 46)  40.67 (  6)   9.67 (  4)
    9  New Hampton           2A-3 ( 4- 2) 180.76  2W 169.50 (  7)  23.67 ( 26)  12.33 (  5)
   10  Waukon                2A-3 ( 5- 1) 180.62  1W 177.80 (  2)  25.00 ( 22)  21.50 ( 25)
   11  Wellman Mid-Prairie   2A-5 ( 5- 1) 178.91  1L 163.63 ( 22)  28.33 ( 16)  13.33 (  6)
   12  Mount Vernon          2A-4 ( 5- 1) 177.78  4W 160.75 ( 32)  36.17 (  9)  15.83 ( 10)
   13  Dyersville Beckman    2A-3 ( 3- 3) 177.41  1W 168.27 ( 12)  23.67 ( 27)  14.50 (  8)
   14  Garner GHV            2A-2 ( 5- 1) 174.77  1W 163.50 ( 23)  27.67 ( 18)  16.17 ( 12)
   15  Clear Lake            2A-2 ( 3- 3) 174.64  1L 162.24 ( 28)  26.83 ( 20)  18.17 ( 18)
   16  Cherokee Washington   2A-1 ( 5- 1) 170.26  1W 155.88 ( 38)  31.50 ( 13)  20.33 ( 22)

Review

Top 16 results

Pre = pregame prediction
Post = postgame prediction
Act = actual game margin


10/02

Cl Rnk Visitor            Score Cl Rnk Home               Score    Pre   Post Act
2A   7 Aplington AP          45 2A  25 LaPorte City Union    16 -17.42 -20.66 -29
2A  53 Davis County           0 2A   1 Albia                 50  70.85  72.77  50
2A  14 Garner GHV            31 2A  19 Osage                 13  -3.11  -6.48 -18
2A  43 MOC-Floyd Valley       0 2A  16 Cherokee Washington   35  13.92  24.09  35
2A  32 Monticello            28 2A   5 Anamosa               52  39.50  34.29  24
2A  12 Mount Vernon          20 2A  17 Center Point-Urbana   12  -2.41  -7.33  -8
2A   9 New Hampton           40 2A  33 Oelwein               13 -24.42 -23.89 -27
2A   6 Spirit Lake           41 2A  22 Sioux Center          38 -33.31 -21.33  -3
2A  39 Roland-Story           0 2A   2 Tama South Tama       49  49.32  48.10  49
2A  34 Waterloo Columbus     27 2A  10 Waukon                30  44.99  26.98   3
3A  14 Waverly-Shell Rock    21 2A  15 Clear Lake            14  -7.80  -6.35  -7
2A  30 WB-Notre Dame         14 2A   8 Central Lee           63   9.87  24.24  49
2A   3 North Fayette Valley   6 2A  13 Dyersville Beckman    14 -22.99 -14.23   8
2A   4 Williamsburg          25 2A  11 Wellman Mid-Prairie    0  -4.16 -11.32 -25

Preview

Top 16 games

Date  Cl Rk (W-L) Visitor              Cl Rk (W-L) Home                   Line Prob
10/09 2A 48 (2-4) Eldora South Hardin  2A  7 (5-1) Aplington AP          42.29  99%
10/09 2A  1 (6-0) Albia                2A 28 (5-1) Baxter CMB           -41.12  99%
10/09 2A 16 (5-1) Cherokee Washington  2A 21 (2-4) Central Lyon CL-G-LR  -3.07  57%
10/09 2A 15 (3-3) Clear Lake           2A 44 (2-4) Forest City          -26.53  94%
10/09 2A 42 (1-5) Estherville LC       2A 14 (5-1) Garner GHV            27.81  95%
10/09 2A  5 (6-0) Anamosa              2A 12 (5-1) Mount Vernon         -11.43  75%
10/09 2A 10 (5-1) Waukon               2A  9 (4-2) New Hampton            1.18  53%
10/09 2A  3 (4-2) North Fayette Valley 2A 19 (3-3) Osage                -24.40  92%
10/09 2A 50 (0-6) Sheldon              2A  6 (6-0) Spirit Lake           51.55 100%
10/09 2A 13 (3-3) Dyersville Beckman   2A 34 (0-6) Waterloo Columbus    -21.68  90%
10/09 2A  8 (5-1) Central Lee          2A 11 (5-1) Wellman Mid-Prairie   -2.17  55%
10/09 2A  2 (6-0) Tama South Tama      2A  4 (5-1) Williamsburg          -6.66  65%

Notes

Rankings are unbiased

Comments are welcome.

Source: iahsaa.org, 2015/10/04 16:00

Comments are closed.