Iowa High School Boys Basketball
Rankings
R Team Conf ( W- L) Mod Str Sched Rank Off Ave Def Ave
1 Western Christian Lake (18- 1) 106.25 13W 80.37 ( 5) 73.63 ( 1) 47.21 ( 12)
2 Cascade W Dubuque R V (17- 1) 95.75 10W 76.82 ( 13) 58.44 ( 42) 41.06 ( 1)
3 Anamosa WAMC (13- 5) 95.04 4W 86.09 ( 1) 66.67 ( 13) 58.11 ( 59)
4 Dike-New Hartford NICL (20- 0) 93.31 20W 67.92 ( 56) 68.40 ( 8) 42.05 ( 2)
5 Monticello R V (14- 5) 93.24 6W 75.48 ( 21) 59.47 ( 36) 42.42 ( 4)
6 Goose Lake Northeast R V (18- 2) 90.92 2W 73.81 ( 31) 59.90 ( 33) 42.15 ( 3)
7 Dyersville Beckman WAMC (12- 7) 89.63 2L 84.42 ( 3) 65.84 ( 16) 59.68 ( 61)
8 Camanche R V (16- 5) 88.34 2W 74.22 ( 30) 66.29 ( 14) 52.24 ( 25)
9 Earlham W C (15- 3) 87.47 3W 65.41 ( 66) 66.11 ( 15) 44.72 ( 6)
10 Treynor W I (16- 1) 87.40 1L 64.53 ( 73) 67.24 ( 12) 45.29 ( 7)
11 Carroll Kuemper H 10 (13- 6) 87.26 1L 78.76 ( 8) 65.63 ( 19) 57.63 ( 52)
12 Des Moines Christian W C (16- 3) 86.28 6W 65.75 ( 62) 69.89 ( 3) 48.16 ( 14)
13 Pella Christian L H ( 9- 9) 86.18 1W 85.04 ( 2) 62.44 ( 26) 60.83 ( 71)
14 Sioux Center S (12- 6) 85.65 1L 80.62 ( 4) 68.22 ( 9) 62.94 ( 77)
15 Garner GHV Top (16- 3) 84.95 6W 62.77 ( 79) 67.42 ( 11) 44.16 ( 5)
16 Pocahontas Area T L (16- 3) 82.07 4W 64.52 ( 74) 68.63 ( 7) 51.11 ( 21)
Review
Top 16 results
Pre = pregame prediction
Post = postgame prediction
Act = actual game margin
02/01 Cl Rnk Visitor Score Cl Rnk Home Score Pre Post Act 2A 71 Denver 40 2A 4 Dike-New Hartford 66 35.73 32.33 26 2A 7 Dyersville Beckman 45 4A 39 Epworth W Dubuque 56 -4.07 -2.36 11 3A 64 Estherville-LC 19 2A 1 Western Christian 83 53.29 52.41 64 2A 13 Pella Christian 38 4A 36 Norwalk 61 1.81 4.94 23 02/02 Cl Rnk Visitor Score Cl Rnk Home Score Pre Post Act 2A 6 Goose Lake Northeast 48 2A 8 Camanche 50 -2.31 -1.33 2 02/04 Cl Rnk Visitor Score Cl Rnk Home Score Pre Post Act 2A 4 Dike-New Hartford 50 2A 35 SumnerFredericksburg 48 -19.99 -17.36 -2 2A 57 Madrid 57 2A 12 Des Moines Christian 72 20.58 20.31 15 2A 5 Monticello 64 2A 25 Wilton 56 -14.78 -14.04 -8 2A 16 Pocahontas Area 60 1A 17 Fort Dodge St Edmond 56 -1.62 -1.62 -4 2A 10 Treynor 71 1A 93 Griswold 40 -34.03 -34.93 -31 02/05 Cl Rnk Visitor Score Cl Rnk Home Score Pre Post Act 2A 3 Anamosa 79 2A 7 Dyersville Beckman 69 -2.27 -4.16 -10 2A 8 Camanche 73 2A 21 Iowa City Regina 62 -7.50 -8.46 -11 2A 11 Carroll Kuemper 87 2A 27 Shenandoah 64 -6.28 -8.75 -23 2A 2 Cascade W Dubuque 63 2A 83 Wellman Mid-Prairie 24 -35.54 -37.00 -39 2A 12 Des Moines Christian 80 2A 92 Stuart West Central 46 -38.60 -39.15 -34 2A 9 Earlham 78 2A 90 Woodward-Granger 32 -38.31 -38.76 -46 2A 6 Goose Lake Northeast 64 2A 33 Durant 59 -14.63 -14.10 -5 3A 31 Knoxville 60 2A 13 Pella Christian 58 9.11 4.04 -2 2A 65 LaPorte City Union 40 2A 4 Dike-New Hartford 77 33.45 31.14 37 1A 8 IKM-Manning 68 2A 10 Treynor 67 3.90 4.03 -1 2A 5 Monticello 79 2A 36 Tipton 48 -15.07 -17.54 -31 3A 9 MOC-Floyd Valley 60 2A 14 Sioux Center 41 -6.08 -7.89 -19 2A 16 Pocahontas Area 69 1A 119 West Bend-Mallard 40 -39.95 -38.47 -29 3A 56 Storm Lake 58 2A 1 Western Christian 97 40.14 40.17 39 02/06 Cl Rnk Visitor Score Cl Rnk Home Score Pre Post Act 2A 2 Cascade W Dubuque 80 3A 19 Maquoketa 53 -3.60 -7.05 -27 2A 15 Garner GHV 59 3A 25 Algona 54 2.04 1.57 -5 2A 6 Goose Lake Northeast 62 3A 45 Central Clinton 39 -11.73 -14.28 -23 2A 60 Lake View East Sac 38 2A 16 Pocahontas Area 54 19.11 17.76 16 3A 7 Sioux City Heelan 74 2A 11 Carroll Kuemper 63 -9.12 -8.48 -11 2A 34 Van Meter 61 2A 13 Pella Christian 72 15.26 12.25 11
Preview
Top 16 games
Date Cl Rk (W-L) Visitor Cl Rk (W-L) Home Line Prob 02/08 1A105 (4-13) Guthrie Center 2A 9 (15-3) Earlham 40.91 100% 02/08 2A 10 (16-1) Treynor 2A 61 (7-11) Underwood -21.37 99% 02/09 2A 11 (13-6) Carroll Kuemper 3A 57 (3-14) Denison-Schleswig -18.75 97% 02/09 2A 13 (9-9) Pella Christian 3A 15 (11-6) Grinnell 4.68 68% 02/09 3A 17 (13-5) West Delaware 2A 3 (13-5) Anamosa 8.10 79% 02/09 2A 51 (5-15) Stanwood North Cedar 2A 8 (16-5) Camanche 20.61 98% 02/09 2A 1 (18-1) Western Christian 2A 75 (6-14) Cherokee Washingto -44.62 100% 02/09 2A 34 (13-7) Van Meter 2A 12 (16-3) Des Moines Christin 12.34 90% 02/09 3A 45 (3-15) Central Clinton 2A 7 (12-7) Dyersville Beckman 15.49 94% 02/09 2A 92 (3-16) Stuart West Central 2A 9 (15-3) Earlham 42.83 100% 02/09 2A 2 (17-1) Cascade W Dubuque 2A 6 (18-2) Goose Lake Northeat -3.59 64% 02/09 1A 80 (1-18) Bellevue 2A 5 (14-5) Monticello 39.85 100% 02/09 2A 16 (16-3) Pocahontas Area 2A 84 (6-13) Northwest Webster -23.46 99% 02/09 2A 58 (4-15) Milford Okoboji 2A 14 (12-6) Sioux Center 20.13 98% 02/09 1A113 (2-16) Oakland Riverside 2A 10 (16-1) Treynor 44.77 100% 02/09 2A 4 (20-0) Dike-New Hartford 2A 86 (2-19) Waterloo Columbus -36.44 100% 02/09 2A 15 (16-3) Garner GHV 1A 67 (9-9) North Union -24.69 99% 02/11 2A 3 (13-5) Anamosa ZZ 31 (0-0) Central DeWitt --CA 0.78 53% 02/11 2A 3 (13-5) Anamosa 3A 45 (3-15) Central Clinton -18.40 97% 02/11 2A 3 (13-5) Anamosa 3A 45 (3-15) Central Clinton -18.40 97% 02/11 2A 13 (9-9) Pella Christian 3A 18 (10-7) Dallas Center-Grime 2.72 61% 02/11 2A 4 (20-0) Dike-New Hartford 2A 81 (5-13) Eldora South Hardi -33.36 100% 02/11 2A 91 (4-15) Eagle Grove 2A 15 (16-3) Garner GHV 39.01 100% 02/11 2A 12 (16-3) Des Moines Christian 2A 57 (11-8) Madrid -17.81 97% 02/11 2A 14 (12-6) Sioux Center 2A 30 (9-9) Rock Valley -8.13 80% 02/11 ZZ 41 (1-1) Sioux Falls Christia 2A 1 (18-1) Western Christian 20.73 98% 02/11 2A 16 (16-3) Pocahontas Area 1A115 (4-16) Sioux Central -37.29 100% 02/12 3A 34 (10-7) Clear Creek-Amana 2A 3 (13-5) Anamosa 15.35 94% 02/12 1A 27 (14-5) Nodaway Valley 2A 11 (13-6) Carroll Kuemper 15.33 94% 02/12 1A 35 (17-2) Easton Valley 2A 2 (17-1) Cascade W Dubuque 26.32 100% 02/12 3A 58 (4-15) Independence 2A 7 (12-7) Dyersville Beckman 25.70 100% 02/12 2A 14 (12-6) Sioux Center 2A 40 (9-10) Inwood West Lyon -10.61 86% 02/12 2A 2 (17-1) Cascade W Dubuque 2A 5 (14-5) Monticello -1.26 55% 02/12 1A 9 (19-0) DM Grand View 2A 13 (9-9) Pella Christian 3.10 62% 02/12 3A 12 (13-4) Atlantic 2A 10 (16-1) Treynor -3.02 62% 02/12 2A 9 (15-3) Earlham 2A 42 (14-4) Truro Interstate-3 -13.08 91%
Notes
Rankings are unbiased.
Comments are welcome.
Source: iahsaa.org, 2016/02/08 06:00